WEBVTT

1
00:00:08.820 --> 00:00:11.190
Nadia El-Masry: Okay, Hello, everyone.

2
00:00:11.200 --> 00:00:18.159
Nadia El-Masry: Thank you for your interest in the fuse to Source station and for joining the Webinar this afternoon.

3
00:00:18.170 --> 00:00:31.950
Nadia El-Masry: My name is Nadia Elmastri, and I am a member of the semiconductor working group at Nsf. I work as a program director in the Erc. Program and the Eec diversion.

4
00:00:31.970 --> 00:00:48.919
Nadia El-Masry: Now I would like to introduce Dr. Anthony Majesky, the division director of Eccs, the electrical communication and cyber System division in the engineering director to give Nsf opening remarks, Tony.

5
00:00:49.920 --> 00:01:08.460
Tony Maciejewski: Thank you, Nadia. Welcome to everyone. Good afternoon or good morning, depending on where you're at. As Nadia said, My name is Tony Macheevsky and I'm. The division director for electrical communications and cyber systems here within the engineering directorate of Andsf,

6
00:01:08.470 --> 00:01:16.950
Tony Maciejewski: and on on behalf of all of the five directorates that are involved in the fuse program. I sort of want to welcome all of you

7
00:01:16.960 --> 00:01:31.190
Tony Maciejewski: um to tell you a little bit about myself. I I am an Ipa, a rotator here at Nsf. And I'm. Just celebrating my first year anniversary, and if any of you out there thinking of rotator positions, I highly recommend it.

8
00:01:31.200 --> 00:01:38.560
Tony Maciejewski: My home institution is Colorado State University, where I'm. A faculty member of electrical and computer brain community.

9
00:01:38.570 --> 00:01:52.730
Tony Maciejewski: And prior to coming to. And so I spent nineteen years as a department of electrical and computer engineering. And so, unfortunately, I sort of had a first

10
00:01:52.740 --> 00:02:11.589
Tony Maciejewski: Ah, but row seat in in in seeing the decrease in interest, in in semiconductor education amongst our students and and Ece Ah departments, and that was kind of disheartening, especially to see many of my colleagues have to shudder their ah clean rooms.

11
00:02:11.600 --> 00:02:24.970
Tony Maciejewski: So i'm. I'm. Very excited to see this this renaissance of interest in in semiconductor research and education and workforce development and and thrill to be a part of it, and thank you all for being here.

12
00:02:24.980 --> 00:02:45.800
Tony Maciejewski: Um! The key solicitation is very interesting from another number of points of view. I think one is the fact that it is so multidisciplinary. You know we do have five different directorates working on it, and of course all of our directorates have been supporting research, and in semiconductor field for quite a while our colleagues in

13
00:02:45.810 --> 00:03:05.389
Tony Maciejewski: in the materials research television, you know, Look at new materials that also when engineering can make into devices, and then our our colleagues and seismic systems out of those devices. And so we have supported research across the technology stack. But what's unique here infuse is that we actually want to

14
00:03:05.400 --> 00:03:13.029
Tony Maciejewski: fumes all of that together. And and look at co-design across the technology stack. So that's an important part of the

15
00:03:13.040 --> 00:03:30.700
Tony Maciejewski: the fuse solicitation, as well as the fact that they have the three different topic areas so looking at domain-specific computing looking at heterogeneous integration which is going to be critical to sort of go get more than more scaling,

16
00:03:30.710 --> 00:03:34.170
and also the focus on materials. Research.

17
00:03:34.180 --> 00:03:53.359
Tony Maciejewski: Um, Another aspect of fuse. I think that's very important is the focus on workforce development, right? The fact that there has to be a plan for education and workforce development, because, as I mentioned, we do need to show our future students the excitement of working within the semiconductor industry.

18
00:03:53.370 --> 00:04:14.609
Tony Maciejewski: And finally, um! I think I want to touch on the the importance of the industry participation. You know I am so thankful for our foreign industry partners. We can't do any of this without you with your guidance in terms of what's important, both in terms of research, directions and your workforce development needs.

19
00:04:14.620 --> 00:04:26.109
Tony Maciejewski: So thank you very much for being part of it, and I guess, thanks to all of you for for being a private sector like I said, i'm loving to see this renaissance and interest in the semiconductor industry. So thank you all.

20
00:04:27.580 --> 00:04:46.449
Nadia El-Masry: Thank you, Tony. Now, I would like to introduce my colleague, Jason Halstone. Jason is a program director in the computer and Network Systems division within the Size directorate and one of the team members in the semiconductor working here at Nsf:

21
00:04:46.460 --> 00:04:47.620
Nadia El-Masry: Ah, Giza,

22
00:04:47.860 --> 00:05:14.930
Jason Hallstrom: thank you, Nadia. Today we're going to provide an overview of the fuse to solicitation. This is nsf twenty, four, five to one, and we're going to give you a chance. Towards the end of the Webinar today to ask any questions you might have. It's important throughout the Webinar today to keep in mind that the Webinar is not a substitute for the solicitation. The solicitation, of course, remains the definitive standard for any information related to C two, and of course we encourage all of our attendees to to read the solicitation

23
00:05:14.940 --> 00:05:15.940
carefully.

24
00:05:19.140 --> 00:05:38.320
Jason Hallstrom: As Tony mentioned. Fuse two is a multi-division multi-directed program, and we're pleased today to be joined by colleagues from E and G. Mps Guys meeting you and Tip, you should feel free to reach out to any of the participating program directors that you see on the slide here that are listed within the solicitation. But we ask you to please use the email address,

25
00:05:38.330 --> 00:05:50.310
Jason Hallstrom: fuse one at Nsf. Gov. And of course we encourage you to review the funding portfolios across the participating divisions and directorates to help. Better contextualize your proposed work,

26
00:05:50.320 --> 00:05:59.399
Jason Hallstrom: and I just do want to point out one more time, and i'll point it out again toward the end of the Webinar that it is not a typo to reach us. It is fuse one at N,

27
00:06:04.260 --> 00:06:14.740
Jason Hallstrom: as You all know, semiconductor technologies already play central roles in our daily lives from computing and telecommunications to health care, and that set of application areas continues to grow.

28
00:06:14.750 --> 00:06:27.849
Jason Hallstrom: The Us. Has long been a leader in the area of semiconductor, particularly on the R. And D. Side, and there are many new opportunities to expand this leadership position and to address key semiconductor challenges both nationally and globally.

29
00:06:27.980 --> 00:06:37.039
Jason Hallstrom: The main driver behind the Chips and Science Act is the observation that semiconductor technology and innovation are critical to the economic growth and national security of the Us.

30
00:06:37.130 --> 00:06:43.210
Jason Hallstrom: We need significant help from our research community, both academia and industry to tackle these challenges

31
00:06:46.180 --> 00:07:02.539
Jason Hallstrom: in response to the Chips and Science Act, Nfs put out two solicitations, both under the name of future of semiconductors. We're going to refer to those excuse one and choose two for short, the former with a collaboration between the Nsf. And four industry partner, Erickson, Ibm. Intel, and Samsung.

32
00:07:02.550 --> 00:07:13.949
Jason Hallstrom: The current solicitation is a modification of the former. This is twenty, four, five, two, one. It is again a collaboration between and Nsf. And industry, namely, Erickson, Intel, Micron, and Samsung

33
00:07:14.030 --> 00:07:33.479
Jason Hallstrom: at the highest level of abstraction. The goal of the fuse program is to cultivate a broad coalition of researchers from across science and engineering communities to utilize a holistic co-design approach to fundamental research, education and training challenges and to ultimately enable rapid progress in new semiconductor technology,

34
00:07:33.490 --> 00:07:43.389
Jason Hallstrom: we expect that this collaboration between the and and our industry partners will help to accelerate the translation into practice of technological innovations that are developed under this program

35
00:07:46.370 --> 00:08:02.589
Jason Hallstrom: for clarity. This is actually the the third two solicitation. The first was launched in twenty two, and that was focused on teaming specifically the development of new fuse teams. The second was launched in two thousand and twenty three, as I just mentioned, with a focus on holistic Co-design,

36
00:08:02.600 --> 00:08:14.220
Jason Hallstrom: importantly fuse two the current solicitation is wholly independent of the former solicitation. So applicants are not required to have participated in either of the preceding rounds of fuse

37
00:08:17.340 --> 00:08:25.079
Jason Hallstrom: with the chips and science, to act as motivating context. The key goals of the fuse. Two solicitation are threefold in their complementary.

38
00:08:25.090 --> 00:08:39.580
Jason Hallstrom: First, the solicitation seeks to advance research and development in semiconductor technology, exploring new materials processes and designs for future devices and systems. And as we're going to reiterate throughout the Webinar today, co-design is a central theme of this solicitation.

39
00:08:40.289 --> 00:08:48.420
Jason Hallstrom: Second, the solicitation seeks to advance interdisciplinary education and workforce development, to prepare the next-generation semiconductor workforce.

40
00:08:48.500 --> 00:09:05.259
Jason Hallstrom: And finally, the solicitation seeks to enable the translation of fundamental research advancements into applications into societal impact. Our industry partners, of course, play a central role here, helping us to better understand the semiconductor ecosystem and the specific challenges that are based by industry.

41
00:09:05.270 --> 00:09:08.960
Jason Hallstrom: So please do keep these goals in mind while developing your proposals.

42
00:09:11.930 --> 00:09:28.199
Jason Hallstrom: To put a finer point on this, the division's, directorates, and the industry partners refuse to were collected with some intention. The vision of the program is to translate foundational research into products and solutions that benefit society and drive economic growth consistent with the chips and scientists,

43
00:09:28.210 --> 00:09:45.379
Jason Hallstrom: P and G size, Mps and me. You, on the left-hand side are responsible for supporting fundamental research and education activities conducted by Rpi and our colleagues in tip are responsible for facilitating a handshake. The coordination with our industry. Partners on the right hand side,

44
00:09:45.390 --> 00:09:48.459
Jason Hallstrom: who have a better understanding of market needs and challenges.

45
00:09:48.640 --> 00:09:58.290
Jason Hallstrom: The goal is refused to form a ramp of opportunity from fundamental research to societal impact and commercialization overcoming the infamous value of death

46
00:09:58.300 --> 00:10:11.510
Jason Hallstrom: before we get into more details of the solicitation we'd like to give each of our four partners an opportunity to introduce themselves and to share their respective interest in the fuse program. I'll first turn it over to our partners for America.

47
00:10:17.040 --> 00:10:29.159
Ali Khayrallah: Hi, good morning, everybody. My name is Ali Kairara. I'm. With the advanced technology group of Erickson in Santa Clara, California.

48
00:10:29.330 --> 00:10:32.830
Ali Khayrallah: So it's my pleasure to be with you here today.

49
00:10:33.100 --> 00:10:42.039
Ali Khayrallah: Erickson, as you know, is a mainly a mobile infrastructure company and our areas of interest, I,

50
00:10:42.570 --> 00:11:02.319
Ali Khayrallah: our frequency systems, data converters, energy management, compute sensors. You name it. So we are very tightly connected with the semiconductor industry, and we rely very heavily on advances made by the semiconductor research and development.

51
00:11:02.330 --> 00:11:05.330
Ali Khayrallah: So why are we interested in this program?

52
00:11:05.840 --> 00:11:09.700
Ali Khayrallah: The evolution of wireless communication has been

53
00:11:09.760 --> 00:11:17.279
Ali Khayrallah: outpacing so-called Moore's law for decades and the way we have been cashing up is by semiconductor innovation.

54
00:11:17.380 --> 00:11:25.500
Ali Khayrallah: As you know, there's A. In the world of telecom. There's a next step which is referred to as sixg,

55
00:11:25.510 --> 00:11:39.610
Ali Khayrallah: which is expected to be deployed around two thousand and thirty, and this step will be no exception. It will require a lot of innovation in semiconductor to support the features that we're trying to develop.

56
00:11:39.620 --> 00:11:51.670
Ali Khayrallah: So Axon believes in an open environment where industry and academia and government can learn from each other. And we believe this fuse. Two program is an excellent vehicle. To do this,

57
00:11:52.220 --> 00:11:59.159
Ali Khayrallah: The second question is, What do we expect? The program to achieve?

58
00:11:59.190 --> 00:12:11.539
Ali Khayrallah: Accent believes this fuse to will will lay the foundation and develop destructive concepts that will enable the vision that we are developing in the telecom industry.

59
00:12:11.670 --> 00:12:19.320
Ali Khayrallah: It will be an opportunity to share visions and concepts between world-leading teams in industry and academia.

60
00:12:19.430 --> 00:12:27.610
Ali Khayrallah: It will strengthen the as talent pool in semiconductors, which is extremely important for the Us. And global.

61
00:12:28.020 --> 00:12:29.460
Ali Khayrallah: And the

62
00:12:29.590 --> 00:12:47.790
Ali Khayrallah: the third question is, What resources can we make available to the project. So, as you may know, we're a global company with a research organization, and we will engage researchers from the Us. And from other sites in selected projects. One

63
00:12:47.830 --> 00:13:01.060
Ali Khayrallah: we have, of course, as you can expect, many resources that test Chambers equipment lab resources that could also be considered based on the relevance and the availability. And

64
00:13:02.320 --> 00:13:03.599
Ali Khayrallah: Yeah, thank you.

65
00:13:04.150 --> 00:13:07.020
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you, Ali. Next our partners from Intel.

66
00:13:08.960 --> 00:13:36.810
Melissa Cowan: Hi, there, i'm Melissa Count. I'm a program director at intel um in our Port University Research office. Um, please be part of the few solicitation. So Intel is a semiconductor involving world changing technology for the lives of every person on the planet. We are inspired by Moore's law. We continuously work to advance and design and manufacture semiconductors, and our major scope scans across every layer of the technology staff

67
00:13:36.940 --> 00:13:55.670
Melissa Cowan: we are excited to be part of views as we look at views. There's really three really important outcomes that we're looking for one is to really develop a skilled and we're growing a skilled workforce at all levels for semiconductors. We are in this period of unprecedented kind of growth

68
00:13:55.680 --> 00:14:07.719
Melissa Cowan: within this semiconductor industry here in the Us. And so we're looking at really developing a pipeline of diverse talent at all levels from technician to engineers to research sciences.

69
00:14:07.730 --> 00:14:20.579
Melissa Cowan: You know very important within fees. We're looking for outcomes that can really reach into undergraduate classrooms as well as impact students at community colleges and enterprise.

70
00:14:20.590 --> 00:14:33.059
Melissa Cowan: We really want to empower the next generation of faculty. Educators and researchers in the semiconductor field encourage new faculty to take on semiconductor research and really look collaborative,

71
00:14:33.070 --> 00:15:02.800
Melissa Cowan: collaboratively with partners on how we address workforce needs. And then, finally, you know, technology, innovation, Um, advancing us semiconductor manufacturing leadership and and really um. We're interested within a few solicitation that this is a program that that encompasses multiple levels of the step. We have interest in the materials and the advice, technologies, um systems, integration, and packaging technologies of our particular interest to Intel as well as

72
00:15:02.810 --> 00:15:07.020
Melissa Cowan: you know, um new new architectures.

73
00:15:08.790 --> 00:15:35.699
Melissa Cowan: As we engage with with you. We We do plan to provide access to technical measures. We have expertise in all areas of use, so happy to identify collaboration um and maturation pathways with funded proposals. We can also explore access to Intel's University Shuttle program and compute environments for research and and access to student internship.

74
00:15:38.390 --> 00:15:39.550
Melissa Cowan: Thank you.

75
00:15:39.770 --> 00:15:42.739
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you, Melissa next our partners for Mycon.

76
00:15:43.520 --> 00:16:07.749
Mark Helm: Hello, everyone i'm Mark Helm. I'm a senior fellow at Micron meeting microns, pathfinding and strategy groups, as as Jason mentioned, Micron is a newcomer to the fuse program with the fuse. Two solicitation, and we're very excited to be a part of the fuse, two along with the Nsf. And the other industry partners.

77
00:16:07.800 --> 00:16:15.900
Mark Helm: Now, Now, micron being, you know, a leader in memory and storage, we will certainly bring additional interest in

78
00:16:16.230 --> 00:16:26.840
Mark Helm: how these critical components can really compute, to contribute to compute architectures of the future in innovative ways.

79
00:16:26.850 --> 00:16:46.960
Mark Helm: This might be, you know, further evolution of memory devices. It may be exploring new ways, that we more tightly integrate memory and compute for the future to provide nonlinear power, efficiency gains

80
00:16:47.620 --> 00:17:05.479
Mark Helm: several reasons why micron is now joining. You know the the cross-functional teeming approach that Nsf and the industry partners have used for the fuse programs really resonated with us as a key way to develop innovative concepts,

81
00:17:05.490 --> 00:17:16.300
Mark Helm: and the full stack approach being advocated are really where we need to be looking as an industry and a community.

82
00:17:16.640 --> 00:17:26.900
Mark Helm: As you know, point solutions are necessary, but they are insufficient in really providing the revolutionary games that we all are looking for. Now

83
00:17:28.460 --> 00:17:56.320
Mark Helm: we would like to see vertically integrated solutions come from the proposals from and from the awardes. Um, you know, although micron is a memory company, and and we are very interested in things like materials and devices. But we are also very interested in applications and software stack, and there's a very strong recognition that new concepts and memories are

84
00:17:56.330 --> 00:18:02.900
Mark Helm: need that level of support across the entire stack in order to be successful in the marketplace.

85
00:18:04.880 --> 00:18:28.939
Mark Helm: Um, with regards to support, when we are certainly very interested in in collaboration and guidance to the awardees. Um, you know, we micron has a very robust research experience across the stack that is part of the fuse to solicitation, and we hope to provide perspective that is valuable to the community of Awardes.

86
00:18:28.960 --> 00:18:46.010
Mark Helm: Under the right circumstances we can offer access to our R. And D capabilities in the Us. And of course we have very strong interest in your students for internships and and potential future career opportunities as well.

87
00:18:46.800 --> 00:18:47.880
Mark Helm: He

88
00:18:48.270 --> 00:18:49.390
Jason Hallstrom: thank you. Mark.

89
00:18:49.400 --> 00:18:51.250
Jason Hallstrom: Next are partners from Santa.

90
00:18:51.770 --> 00:19:00.569
Stephen Chae: Hello, everyone! My name is Steven Chair. I'm: from open innovation team and I'm. Currently located in San Jose, California.

91
00:19:00.580 --> 00:19:15.889
Stephen Chae: We have a many area of interest under the pews program. Next generation. Computing is the one of them, probably including scalable heterogeneous architecture. Also Hbc. Accelerator and quantum computing,

92
00:19:15.900 --> 00:19:35.750
Stephen Chae: and also we have ah interest on Ai for semiconductor industry device, heterogeneous integration, low energy, high density embedded the memory devices you or improve the memory technology. And also we have an interest on over enabling material devices and processes in a broader spectrum of a window. One

93
00:19:36.150 --> 00:19:51.780
Stephen Chae: while you're interested in Samsung is excited to partner in the huge sol station. Given the need for the strong investment in the basic and applied research and also workforce training that will accelerate future semi-conducted technology development.

94
00:19:51.790 --> 00:19:56.809
Stephen Chae: Ultimately it will lead to the broad, social, and associated, or benefit.

95
00:19:57.260 --> 00:20:15.610
Stephen Chae: What is the our expectation? And then what to achieve? We expect that the strong emphasis on co-developing across the computing stack, which is the essential element of the program, and it will identify you way to compute with high efficiency, speed, and density

96
00:20:15.620 --> 00:20:21.859
Stephen Chae: as well as a provide a significant advancement to existing computing technology.

97
00:20:21.870 --> 00:20:35.979
Stephen Chae: Lastly, what resources can you make available to the projects we actually look forward to engaging with the funded project to provide industry, insight, and also identify complementary collaboration, opportunity,

98
00:20:35.990 --> 00:20:52.759
Stephen Chae: as well as a facilitating knowledge exchange. Ah! Be a visiting Samsung researcher where possible, We also hope to find opportunity for other tangible types of engagement to support validation of the technology which developed under the fuse program.

99
00:20:52.770 --> 00:20:54.060
Stephen Chae: Thank you very much.

100
00:20:54.680 --> 00:21:05.890
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you, Stephen, And to just reiterate Tony's comments from the start of the Webinar. We are very grateful to our industry partners for their support of the fuse program and for their participation in the Webinar today. So thanks so much.

101
00:21:07.750 --> 00:21:24.519
Jason Hallstrom: We now come to the core of the fuse to solicitation, and we are we are going to focus on Co-design. Semiconductors can be viewed as a combination of technologies that are stacked at different levels, and these can be coarsely broken down into three key areas, material devices and systems

102
00:21:24.650 --> 00:21:50.809
Jason Hallstrom: in large parts. The research within these areas occurs mostly independent of the other aspects of the technology stack and the goal of its use. Ii program is to change that to support fundamental research, enabling co-design of semiconductor materials, devices, and systems that will propel us semiconductor, manufacturing and applications beyond the current bottleneck, while enabling new application areas in growing the semiconductor research and development. Talent Pool

103
00:21:51.050 --> 00:22:03.319
Jason Hallstrom: co-design is emphasized throughout the solicitation to encourage cross fertilization among broad areas of research sponsored by the Nsf. Supporting activities that do not fit well within individual programs.

104
00:22:03.330 --> 00:22:14.749
Jason Hallstrom: This calls for joint consideration of material device and system performance, as well as other aspects of interest, including manufacturerability, recyclability, environmental impact and other factors.

105
00:22:14.870 --> 00:22:25.459
Jason Hallstrom: Co-design represents the unification of the research and design fabric across these areas under a common Ah R. And D. Environment, tightly coupled with education and workforce development.

106
00:22:26.740 --> 00:22:44.980
Jason Hallstrom: The fuse. Two solicitation identifies three topic: areas topic, one collaborative research and domain-specific computing topic, two advanced function in high performance by heterogeneous integration and topic, three new materials for energy efficient enhanced performance and sustainable semiconductor-based systems.

107
00:22:46.960 --> 00:22:54.680
Jason Hallstrom: In thinking through how to architect a competitive fuse to submission. We encourage our pis to use this figure as a reference

108
00:22:54.780 --> 00:23:06.089
Jason Hallstrom: as noted earlier. The semiconductor technology stack can be roughly organized into three layers, banning materials, devices, and systems. You see these as verticals on the graph

109
00:23:06.520 --> 00:23:10.479
Jason Hallstrom: proposals must span at least two of these layers.

110
00:23:10.570 --> 00:23:30.330
Jason Hallstrom: Similarly, proposals must pursue at least one of the three topic areas across those layers. So, while a proposal may pursue multiple topics. Precisely one topic area must be identified as the primary topic area. So it's. Choose two across the top. Choose one or more along the the vertical

111
00:23:30.750 --> 00:23:35.420
Jason Hallstrom: education and workforce development activities should, of course, be closely integrated,

112
00:23:36.610 --> 00:23:42.389
Jason Hallstrom: so it may be useful to consider a a few potential instantiations of this architecture.

113
00:23:42.880 --> 00:23:51.709
Jason Hallstrom: The first case On the left-hand side of the slide we see a proposal that's focused on topic, one with work spanning devices and systems

114
00:23:52.440 --> 00:23:57.820
Jason Hallstrom: the middle. We see a topic two proposal that's focused on materials and devices. We

115
00:23:58.510 --> 00:24:12.360
Jason Hallstrom: topic rather. The third example covers materials and devices across topic, two in topic three. But importantly, only one topic has been identified as the primary topic in this case. Topic two.

116
00:24:12.800 --> 00:24:31.670
Jason Hallstrom: So we want to emphasize this point. Exactly One primary topic must be identified, and it must be identified within the title of the within the title of the proposal. Using this format fuse, two topic, one, two, or three, followed by the actual technical title of your proposal

117
00:24:33.130 --> 00:24:50.500
Jason Hallstrom: awards. In Fy twenty four will be up to two million dollars per award, for up to three years, of course, commensur with the scope and team size and the program seeks to fund collaborative research and education that transcends the traditional boundaries of individual disciplines to achieve program goals again by low-breaking.

118
00:24:51.430 --> 00:24:56.699
Jason Hallstrom: We're not going to spend some time just hitting the highlights of topic one two and thirty

119
00:24:56.710 --> 00:25:15.900
Jason Hallstrom: topic, one collaborative research and domain-specific computing seeks to increase performance, energy, efficiency, usability, sustainability, and other aspects of computing systems through co-design approaches, that leverage characteristics of specific domains, We encourage you to consider domain-specific in the broadest sense.

120
00:25:15.910 --> 00:25:26.750
Jason Hallstrom: Example domains of interest include application, domains, computing strategy, domains and technical rather technology domains. And there are several examples that are articulated within the solicitation

121
00:25:27.880 --> 00:25:43.880
Jason Hallstrom: topic two is focused on advanced function and high performance through heterogeneous integration with the goal of accelerating the adoption of advanced electronic memory platonic energy or sensing devices and components in semiconductor technology to enable cutting edge functionality.

122
00:25:44.150 --> 00:25:57.589
Jason Hallstrom: Examples include. But again, are not limited to heterogeneous integration and heterogeneous technology. Ingredients package, platform, heterogeneous integration and heterogeneous integration, system, design and characterization, technology

123
00:25:59.300 --> 00:26:06.029
Jason Hallstrom: topic, three new materials for energy efficient enhanced performance and sustainable semiconductor-based systems

124
00:26:06.050 --> 00:26:18.649
Jason Hallstrom: potential areas of interest. Again, examples. These are not prescriptive novel materials, or innovative combinations of materials enabling novel energy, efficient logic and or memory functions, including non-von neumann logic

125
00:26:18.660 --> 00:26:34.849
Jason Hallstrom: novel materials, or innovative combinations of material for next generation, interconnect heterogeneous integration in devices and packaging at relevant dimensions, materials to enable patterning with the next generation of extreme ultraviolet in high- numerical aperture, e uv. And moderately photoresists,

126
00:26:34.860 --> 00:26:55.719
Jason Hallstrom: as well as novel bottom of patterning approaches such as direct and self-assembly and finally the development of new characterization methods and or high resolution, imaging technologies for the characterization of materials at the electronic device or chip level, for example, electrical or thermal transport or defect mapping at the atomic molecular level in a functioning electronic device.

127
00:26:57.920 --> 00:27:12.539
Jason Hallstrom: As we said, education and workforce development activities serve a central role in fuse two and must play a central role in all successful fuse. To submiss these activities are expected to be tightly integrated with the proposed research activity.

128
00:27:12.680 --> 00:27:28.220
Jason Hallstrom: All proposals must include within the broader impact description a section titled Education and Workforce Development Plan, which must articulate education and workforce development goals, plans for recruitment, retention and graduation of students from underrepresented groups.

129
00:27:28.230 --> 00:27:35.060
Jason Hallstrom: Plans for assessing the effectiveness of the Ewd plans and plans to integrate research and ewd components.

130
00:27:35.120 --> 00:27:44.820
Jason Hallstrom: Pis are of course, encouraged to engage experts in education, curriculum development, academic assessment in other areas as appropriate to the Ewd plans.

131
00:27:48.030 --> 00:28:07.689
Jason Hallstrom: Now we're going to briefly review the mechanics of the solicitation. There are no letters of intent or pre-procals required or accepted for this competition. All full proposals are due by March fourteenth, two thousand, and twenty four no later than five Pm. Local time proposals can be submitted either through research that

132
00:28:08.970 --> 00:28:23.960
Jason Hallstrom: and a submission deadline. An Api copi or senior personnel must hold a tenured or ten year track position, or a primary full time paid appointment in a research or teaching position, with exception granted for family or medical leave, as determined by the submitting institution

133
00:28:24.710 --> 00:28:34.800
Jason Hallstrom: Individuals with primary appointment to for-profit non-academic organizations or at overseas branch campuses of u s institutions of higher education are not eligible to apply

134
00:28:34.870 --> 00:28:45.930
Jason Hallstrom: researchers from foreign academic institutions who contribute essential expertise to the project may participate as senior personnel or collaborators, but they may not receive nsf financial support

135
00:28:46.730 --> 00:28:54.100
Jason Hallstrom: Nsf. Twenty, three, five, five, two recipients. These are recipients under the previous cues. Call that it's fuse one

136
00:28:54.110 --> 00:29:10.880
Jason Hallstrom: not serve as P. I. Or copi for the fuse to solicitation, but they may serve as senior personnel. These points are important. We're actually going to hit them again a bit later in the Webinar proposals that violate these limitations will be returned without review. So please do pay attention to these requirements.

137
00:29:15.060 --> 00:29:32.679
Jason Hallstrom: The awards will be issued as either standard or continuing grants. The total available budget for this program is forty million dollars. We expect to award approximately twenty awards, under the solicitation with each award providing up to two million dollars of support for a period of up to three years.

138
00:29:33.000 --> 00:29:42.570
Jason Hallstrom: Of course, the number of awards, size, duration, et cetera, will dispense will depend on the responsiveness of the solicitation, and it's always subject to the availability of funds.

139
00:29:44.120 --> 00:29:59.099
Jason Hallstrom: We've covered again some of these points already, but they're important enough that we're going to repeat some of them. Here, Please read the solicitation carefully. Non-compliant proposals will be returned without review. And We just. We really hate to do that. So we're going to really hammer on this point.

140
00:29:59.190 --> 00:30:15.289
Jason Hallstrom: Pis must hold primary full-time paid appointments in research or teaching positions at us-based campuses individuals with primary appointments at for-profit, non-academic organizations, or in overseas branch. Campuses of us institutions of higher education are not eligible.

141
00:30:15.500 --> 00:30:33.190
Jason Hallstrom: An individual may appear as p iii or a senior personnel on only one fuse, two proposals, although there is no limit on the number of proposals for organizations, so we could have two separate pis, two separate faculty members from an academic institution to apply that permissible.

142
00:30:34.190 --> 00:30:40.779
Jason Hallstrom: This solicitation allows only a single proposal submission with sub awards that are administered by the weed organization

143
00:30:45.140 --> 00:30:57.149
Jason Hallstrom: proposals responding to this solicitation must include a project, management and collaboration section. It must address the following: The need for sustained support of a multidisciplinary team using a convergence research approach.

144
00:30:57.320 --> 00:31:05.089
Jason Hallstrom: Why, the project team is appropriate to realize the project's goal, and how the team will ensure effective collaboration in the co-design process

145
00:31:05.140 --> 00:31:13.550
Jason Hallstrom: and a compelling rationale for a multi-organization project structure, inclusion of minority, serving and escort institution is strongly encouraged.

146
00:31:15.200 --> 00:31:22.990
Jason Hallstrom: Again, every proposal must select at least one topic area spanning at least two layers of the semiconductor technology stack.

147
00:31:23.370 --> 00:31:35.199
Jason Hallstrom: A single primary topic area must be identified in the project title, using the required format and the topics and layers addressed by the proposal must be captured in the very first sentence of the project summary.

148
00:31:35.230 --> 00:31:37.070
Jason Hallstrom: So, as an example,

149
00:31:37.410 --> 00:31:50.979
Jason Hallstrom: an appropriate first sentence for a proposal might be at rather for a great project, summary would be disproportable focuses on topic one devices and systems that would appear as the very first sentence in the project. Coming

150
00:31:53.630 --> 00:32:08.770
Jason Hallstrom: broad collaboration is encouraged by the solicitation spanning academic institutions, industry, partners, national laboratories, and other organizations. And while all of these organizations are eligible to participate. There are funding restrictions, some of which we've already touched upon.

151
00:32:08.780 --> 00:32:15.170
Jason Hallstrom: Please do consult the award policies and Procedures guide concerning funding eligibility for these organizations,

152
00:32:15.220 --> 00:32:26.129
Jason Hallstrom: submissions from escort states, and jurisdictions, as well as minority-serving institutions historically black colleges and universities. Hispanic-serving institutions and tribal colleges and universities are encouraged

153
00:32:26.790 --> 00:32:38.160
Jason Hallstrom: proposals are encouraged to leverage leverage other activities and resources, including existing collaborations and programs, such as Ahrus, Ahs, and others to broaden opportunities and expand participation.

154
00:32:38.640 --> 00:32:57.780
Jason Hallstrom: The national science foundation is committed to advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion, and creating opportunities for everyone everywhere. Finally, industrial collaborations may be supported through the Nsf building mechanism in conjunction with this solicitation, and we encourage folks who are interested in pursuing that option to review carefully

155
00:32:57.790 --> 00:33:00.229
Jason Hallstrom: the Goalie solicitation for more details. The

156
00:33:01.870 --> 00:33:11.609
Jason Hallstrom: full proposals will be reviewed according to the Standard and Nsf. Merit Review criteria, using the Standard and Ss review process which most attendees today are familiar with

157
00:33:11.690 --> 00:33:21.990
Jason Hallstrom: the standard merit, review criteria apply intellectual merit. Criterion encompasses the potential to advance knowledge, the technological advancement of scientific advancement

158
00:33:22.000 --> 00:33:32.289
Jason Hallstrom: and the broader impacts Criterion encompass the potential to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of specific desired societal outcomes. This is in some sense the so what criterion

159
00:33:32.330 --> 00:33:35.290
Jason Hallstrom: reviewers will also be asked to address

160
00:33:35.330 --> 00:33:42.030
Jason Hallstrom: fuse two specific review criteria that are identified in the solicitation in which we will read through. Now

161
00:33:42.990 --> 00:33:53.519
Jason Hallstrom: these are the fuse, two specific review criteria that reviewers will be asked to specifically evaluate the proposals again. And of course, not all questions are relevant to all proposals

162
00:33:54.260 --> 00:34:00.030
Jason Hallstrom: does the project identify an overarching foundational problem which requires a co-design approach

163
00:34:00.390 --> 00:34:10.049
Jason Hallstrom: our energy-efficient, sustainable device, Manufacturing processes using earth abundance in nontoxic materials, minimizing water usage, and striving for zero waste amplitudes

164
00:34:10.480 --> 00:34:21.809
Jason Hallstrom: does the proposal identify an integrated, multidisciplinary research agenda that defines the roles of all participants, and is the composition of the multidisciplinary team appropriate for the scope of the proposed activity

165
00:34:22.730 --> 00:34:28.309
Jason Hallstrom: How are the research tasks synergistically integrated across the identified research focus area?

166
00:34:28.420 --> 00:34:33.469
Jason Hallstrom: Does the proposal address the Associated research risks and present mitigation plans?

167
00:34:34.170 --> 00:34:49.849
Jason Hallstrom: How effectively does the proposal present a compelling argument that the proposed educational activities will equip students and other workforce participants with the skills to engage in the evolving semiconductor industry and broaden participation by building on best practices and evidence-based Approach

168
00:34:53.020 --> 00:35:08.350
Jason Hallstrom: importantly. Fuse to industry, partners, erickson intel Micron and Samsung may not participate in fuse two proposals in any manner. If a fuse to industry partner is included within a submitted proposal, it will be returned without review

169
00:35:08.460 --> 00:35:18.979
Jason Hallstrom: to put a finer coin on this proposals may not list or describe any kind of agreed or assumed arrangement to use the contribution, spy, or any other collaborative arrangements with

170
00:35:19.230 --> 00:35:26.090
Jason Hallstrom: the fuse to industry partners that have been identified in the solicitation, and who you've had a chance to meet earlier in the Webinar

171
00:35:26.560 --> 00:35:33.880
Jason Hallstrom: proposers are not restricted, however, for making use of widely accessible products or services of those fused to industry Partners

172
00:35:34.770 --> 00:35:42.370
Jason Hallstrom: Proposers should not contact the forest use to industry partners with questions pertaining to their company's. Participation in the solicitation.

173
00:35:42.910 --> 00:35:53.100
Jason Hallstrom: All questions involving fuse to including participation of industry. Partners should be should be directed to the and Nfs at fuse one at and Nsf. Ah,

174
00:35:53.480 --> 00:35:57.099
Jason Hallstrom: please read the eligibility section of the solicitation carefully

175
00:35:59.230 --> 00:36:10.810
Jason Hallstrom: to further clarify the role of fuse to industry Partners On this solicitation prior to awards, these two industry partners will not participate in or observe. The review,

176
00:36:10.950 --> 00:36:25.370
Jason Hallstrom: and Nsf. Will, however, share some of the proposals which are under consideration for funding along with reviews and panel summaries and and Nsf. Will take into consideration the input of all Ts. To industry partners prior to making final funding decisions

177
00:36:25.540 --> 00:36:40.080
Jason Hallstrom: Importantly, Nsf. Will, however, retain final authority for making all award decisions, and finally, proprietary or privileged information that might be provided in the single copy documents. Section will not be shared with reviewers or industry partners

178
00:36:42.590 --> 00:36:55.649
Jason Hallstrom: post award and a step to administer the awards under the program. In accordance with Standard and Nsf. Policies and procedures, the fuse to industry. Partners will not oversee the activities or the use of funds provided to grantees,

179
00:36:56.110 --> 00:37:07.740
Jason Hallstrom: fuse to industry. Partners may make available direct contributions of resources. For example, software data sets computing infrastructure, but no awarding will be required to use any industry. Partners

180
00:37:07.800 --> 00:37:25.050
Jason Hallstrom: direct offered contribution. A fuse to industry partner may also arrange to fund its own personnel and as researchers to directly participate with Awardy project personnel. But these arrangements will be optional, and upon the mutual consent of the industry partner, and the respective awarding institution.

181
00:37:25.060 --> 00:37:28.619
Jason Hallstrom: No awardee will be required to accept an industry partner. Researcher

182
00:37:29.100 --> 00:37:39.370
Jason Hallstrom: and Nsf. Will share annual and final project reports with views to industry partners, but only after those reports have been reviewed and accepted by the cognitive and Nsf. Program. Officer

183
00:37:41.820 --> 00:37:48.870
Jason Hallstrom: fuse to awards will include specific provisions related to intellectual property generated underfunded projects.

184
00:37:49.050 --> 00:37:52.460
Jason Hallstrom: The award terms and conditions will include the following

185
00:37:52.760 --> 00:38:12.469
Jason Hallstrom: awardes shall grant to the sponsoring parties a non-exclusive worldwide paid-up non-transferable, irrevocable royalty-free license to all intellectual property rights and any invention conceived or first reduced to practice in the performance of the program work under the funding agreement importantly. This is a non-exclusive license

186
00:38:12.690 --> 00:38:21.559
Jason Hallstrom: award. He shall grant the license to each industry partner named in the corresponding award letter, unless, of course, the industry partner opts to decline that license.

187
00:38:22.150 --> 00:38:28.420
Jason Hallstrom: This license shall not extend to Awardy's background Intellectual property That is what the institutions bring to the table.

188
00:38:28.970 --> 00:38:36.100
Jason Hallstrom: Intel Micron and Samsung will be named as sponsors for all awards in Erickson will be named as a sponsor in a partial kind of award.

189
00:38:36.190 --> 00:38:42.349
Jason Hallstrom: No rights or licenses are granted or assumed by the fuse to industry partners to award you.

190
00:38:42.470 --> 00:38:48.910
Jason Hallstrom: Finally, Awardes may delay the publishing of data and software describing inventions to first permit to filing a patent application

191
00:38:48.960 --> 00:38:50.820
Jason Hallstrom: following standard practice.

192
00:38:53.150 --> 00:39:03.149
Jason Hallstrom: Now the Webinar cover the main points of the fuse. Two program we want to emphasize again that the solicitation is the definitive source for all requirements of policy specific to this solicitation

193
00:39:03.590 --> 00:39:11.620
Jason Hallstrom: and the standard regulations that are captured in the Phpg. Apply, we ask all the proposers to please review both of those documents carefully,

194
00:39:13.370 --> 00:39:24.779
Jason Hallstrom: and if that program officers are here to help, if any questions arise, if you're developing your proposal, we want you to reach out to us. Please do direct all inquiries to fuse one at Nsf. Ah, go!

195
00:39:24.790 --> 00:39:34.190
Jason Hallstrom: I realize it's a little bit unusual that this is the fuse to solicitation, and the email address is fuse one. So we ask you to just keep that in mind viewed one at Nfs go.

196
00:39:38.750 --> 00:39:57.839
Jason Hallstrom: So with that it brings us to the end of the Webinar, and we're now going to have a chance for attendees to submit questions, using the Q. And a panel feature in zoom. I'm going to give folks just a minute or two to go ahead and enter their question in the Q. And A. As they arise, and we're going to do our best to address as many as we can.

197
00:39:57.850 --> 00:40:07.829
Jason Hallstrom: We're fortunate to have many members of the fuse to team here on the zoom call today. So as questions come in, i'll direct those questions to the appropriate Pd. On the call.

198
00:40:10.910 --> 00:40:13.220
Jason Hallstrom: So I just need one minute to

199
00:40:14.250 --> 00:40:16.070
Jason Hallstrom: sort my screen,

200
00:40:28.720 --> 00:40:48.220
Nadia El-Masry: Jason. Uh, I would like to uh address uh one uh several questions that that all is one question an industry, small business can uh collaborate with industry uh with the Academia for a proposal,

201
00:40:48.230 --> 00:40:55.910
Nadia El-Masry: as we all know that this is allowed at Nsf. By submitting a goalie.

202
00:40:56.410 --> 00:41:08.939
Nadia El-Masry: And so I am just, you know, directing everyone to go to Nsf's website and look at the Goalie proposal rules and regulations as far as

203
00:41:08.950 --> 00:41:16.460
Nadia El-Masry: who can be on the cover page as a copi, and how the budget can be construct.

204
00:41:16.810 --> 00:41:25.719
Nadia El-Masry: I'm asking any one of my colleagues who's running a core program to answer the question of the budget issue.

205
00:41:28.380 --> 00:41:32.370
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you, Daddy. So i'm going to begin to read the questions that they come in,

206
00:41:32.380 --> 00:41:53.320
Jason Hallstrom: and if they're short I will. I will address them directly, otherwise I will direct them to the appropriate Cd. So a number of folks are asking, Can a fuse Two proposal include collaboration with a national lab? The answer is, Yes, a national laboratory can be a collaborating partner. But there are restrictions on funding eligibility that are documented within the solicitation and within the

207
00:41:59.820 --> 00:42:14.390
Jason Hallstrom: can you? Typically, the Nsf does not go to the national lab. So the sub I was to the national lab is unlikely to be allowed.

208
00:42:16.220 --> 00:42:17.359
Jason Hallstrom: It's it's

209
00:42:17.370 --> 00:42:33.449
Charles Ying - NSF: Yeah. And I will add the if a student and our posters are our faculty or other participants at the university, a spread expand us in a small fashion at the national lab.

210
00:42:33.480 --> 00:42:44.509
Charles Ying - NSF: Ah, with the ah scientists are near at the National lab. I I think that would. That would be okay. But no, no funds should go to the national life.

211
00:42:45.940 --> 00:42:47.200
Jason Hallstrom: Hey, Charlotte

212
00:42:47.660 --> 00:42:58.579
Jason Hallstrom: Sharon? The next question i'm going to ask you to address. Can you give any guidance on how much system. Circuit prototyping with novel devices would be valued in the context of fuse two.

213
00:43:01.750 --> 00:43:03.260
Jason Hallstrom: You're mute a chance.

214
00:43:05.130 --> 00:43:15.099
X. Sharon Hu: Sorry I was muted. Yeah, I would say it is valued. But the idea of having this prototype is really trying to

215
00:43:15.110 --> 00:43:26.359
X. Sharon Hu: um demonstrate the value or the contribution of a novel ideas, novel research ideas. It should not be just to have a prototype for the sake of prototype.

216
00:43:27.910 --> 00:43:29.029
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you.

217
00:43:29.230 --> 00:43:37.509
Jason Hallstrom: Would you be able to share what fraction of submitted proposals were awarded in fuse one. I'm afraid that we're not able to share that information today.

218
00:43:39.270 --> 00:43:41.139
Jason Hallstrom: The next question

219
00:43:41.550 --> 00:43:46.469
Jason Hallstrom: I am going to ask Michael Hop to address Michael. The question is,

220
00:43:46.640 --> 00:44:00.129
Jason Hallstrom: i'm working in a small business company as a staff engineer, and I would like to collaborate with the University professor to submit a proposal. The question is, Am I eligible to serve as a coup? I in the proposal or program?

221
00:44:01.810 --> 00:44:12.209
Michael Huff: Yeah, Thanks for the question. My understanding is that you can serve as a pi or copi. If you're affiliated with a university,

222
00:44:12.380 --> 00:44:17.780
Michael Huff: you can't have any of funds going to a private company, though that is my understanding.

223
00:44:25.680 --> 00:44:29.570
Jason Hallstrom: So There is a question here for Melissa,

224
00:44:30.270 --> 00:44:42.349
Jason Hallstrom: Melissa, Melissa, Colin in town. The question is which universities are current participants of Intel University shuttle programs. Are they the teams from fuse, or does it have broader participants?

225
00:44:45.700 --> 00:44:53.490
Melissa Cowan: Hi there? Yeah. So I can't disclose our fullest of university members, but we are supporting

226
00:44:53.500 --> 00:45:05.359
Melissa Cowan: dozens of universities across the Us. And even more globally with the University shovel program today, and it's not exclusive to fuse. This program is beyond that. So,

227
00:45:06.460 --> 00:45:23.090
Melissa Cowan: And I would suggest for proposals. Considering the shuttle, I think what we guided in fuse, one was to assume budgets for a you know, a typical academic, prototyping service, and a proposal and that we can connect after awards are made on shuttle access,

228
00:45:25.000 --> 00:45:26.789
Jason Hallstrom: he with her.

229
00:45:26.800 --> 00:45:35.560
Jason Hallstrom: The next question is, does fuse to consider hardware? Software, Co-design approach. So I just want to be sure. I've read this correctly.

230
00:45:35.720 --> 00:45:42.890
Jason Hallstrom: Does fuse to consider hardware software. Co-design also and Nadia, I'll ask you to address that please.

231
00:45:47.640 --> 00:45:49.790
Jason Hallstrom: I'm ear muted Nadia Harry.

232
00:45:53.140 --> 00:46:09.450
Nadia El-Masry: Yes, uh, like hardware software. Code is an approach. Of course, you know it is uh under the topic one and at the same time. Uh it. It is considered a a an approach as an approach, therefore

233
00:46:09.550 --> 00:46:16.080
Nadia El-Masry: proposal such that it's being considered. However, when you are

234
00:46:16.140 --> 00:46:29.639
Nadia El-Masry: writing your proposal. You have to make sure that you are addressing mainly a specific topic area as Jason has actually eluded in his Webinar.

235
00:46:29.700 --> 00:46:48.400
Nadia El-Masry: So again, i'm. I'm asking everyone to please label your proposal. Ah! The title as which topic area, and which stacks you are Ah! Addressing. Then, followed by the title of the

236
00:46:48.590 --> 00:47:05.580
Nadia El-Masry: Thank you thank you, Nadia. So i'm just going to add to that. So just just to reiterate that hardware software. Co-design is most welcome. But that does not meet the co-design requirement of the solicitation which requires that you span at least two layers of the semiconductor technology. Stack,

237
00:47:06.360 --> 00:47:09.359
Jason Hallstrom: Michael, The next question will be for you.

238
00:47:09.440 --> 00:47:14.519
Michael Huff: I am curious about the role of the tip program within fuse too

239
00:47:15.070 --> 00:47:24.129
Michael Huff: Well, Tip is a new directorate within the Nsf. Relatively new, and our mission is to

240
00:47:24.400 --> 00:47:44.199
Michael Huff: help translate technologies developed into research offices into where they have a broader impact, maybe in a commercial space, or maybe something else. So our role is to help help the performers under this program in any way they can to get their

241
00:47:44.280 --> 00:47:50.929
Michael Huff: ideas and the results of their research out into wider use.

242
00:47:52.830 --> 00:47:54.109
Jason Hallstrom: She's like her.

243
00:47:54.730 --> 00:48:08.630
Jason Hallstrom: The next question is, What are the major differences of fuse to compared to fuse one? The short answer is that there are no major differences between the prior round of fuse and the current run of fuse other than of change in the industry, Partners participating.

244
00:48:11.110 --> 00:48:29.920
Charles Ying - NSF: Ah, you know, like to add, I think there's a couple Ah, ah! Ah! Technical, different differences, and not technical, not in terms of science engineering, but into the association. Ah! When is in the case of feels to ah each semi piss, because they now can only participate one; for

245
00:48:29.930 --> 00:48:42.289
Charles Ying - NSF: in the first and last competition the limitation was two. So this time is only one, and the other is, if somebody,

246
00:48:43.270 --> 00:49:01.619
Charles Ying - NSF: the P. I. Or Code P. I. Of Award. Ah, so the fields one with a word made in September of two thousand and twenty three, and that person cannot be a pi or copi of the fields. Two proposal

247
00:49:01.630 --> 00:49:11.849
Charles Ying - NSF: such person may serve as a senior personnel, so play a role less than a pi on copia.

248
00:49:13.320 --> 00:49:14.640
Jason Hallstrom: It's true.

249
00:49:15.320 --> 00:49:18.400
Jason Hallstrom: So, Sharon, i'm going to ask you to address the next one

250
00:49:18.550 --> 00:49:29.740
Jason Hallstrom: if fabrication is allowed. Will the participating companies provide opportunities for awardees to prototype design, especially those that require gmos plus x.

251
00:49:30.360 --> 00:49:37.650
X. Sharon Hu: I actually probably have to point this question to Nadia, because this is more the Industry sponsorship related.

252
00:49:37.660 --> 00:49:39.170
Nadia, can you help

253
00:49:40.820 --> 00:49:42.009
Nadia El-Masry: It's

254
00:49:42.290 --> 00:49:52.950
Nadia El-Masry: i'm trying to find a good question. I was not listening. I'm sorry. So the question is whether the industry partner, particularly for Cmos Butx, will provide fabrication support,

255
00:49:54.250 --> 00:50:10.859
Nadia El-Masry: I guess. Ah! At this point we are advising to allow in the budget fabrication. Ah services! And you can go for a fabrication. Ah! Anywhere you want, including, you know, the industry.

256
00:50:11.190 --> 00:50:17.390
Nadia El-Masry: But we are not allowed these for industry partners to provide letters of support

257
00:50:17.400 --> 00:50:18.590
now for service,

258
00:50:19.100 --> 00:50:30.190
Nadia El-Masry: but that's just purely as a service. They don't treat them as a collaborator or a sponsor. They? You just go there shop for their fabrication service. Exactly.

259
00:50:30.200 --> 00:50:45.879
Nadia El-Masry: Yeah, just like, you know, if you have on campus uh uh facility for fabrication, and you're paying a service uh charge or service fees. It's the same thing, you know. You can shop for uh, anywhere to do your fabrication.

260
00:50:48.930 --> 00:50:55.179
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you. Next question is a letter of collaboration from one of the four partner companies allowed definitely. Not

261
00:50:55.310 --> 00:51:01.200
Jason Hallstrom: so. The four fuse to industry. Partners may not participate in any fashion with due to exhibition.

262
00:51:02.500 --> 00:51:05.229
Jason Hallstrom: Nadia, The next question will be for you:

263
00:51:05.240 --> 00:51:12.900
Jason Hallstrom: How does the Nss. Determine? The specific directorate, for example, size engineering that reviews the proposals as they're submitted.

264
00:51:13.180 --> 00:51:29.480
Nadia El-Masry: That's exactly why we are emphasizing the fact that you can determine which panel your proposal is going to go to, which is, you know, which directorate that is, or should

265
00:51:29.490 --> 00:51:47.729
Nadia El-Masry: manage your proposal, and put your proposal in a pen. So uh, may I allow you, you know, Am I allowed to to say what's topic? Okay, topic, one is going to size. The week two is going to be engineering and topic three is going to Mps.

266
00:51:47.740 --> 00:51:59.310
Nadia El-Masry: So, according to your proposal, you should be able to determine which community you would like to have in the panel that would evaluate your purpose.

267
00:52:01.870 --> 00:52:03.189
Jason Hallstrom: The carrier

268
00:52:03.820 --> 00:52:04.919
Jason Hallstrom: I

269
00:52:05.140 --> 00:52:20.889
Jason Hallstrom: similar question to one asked previously. Can I reach out to the industry partner to see if they have the specific technology to fabricate? You may not. You should not reach out to any of the few to industry partners. Please direct all inquiries to choose one at, and nsf e go

270
00:52:22.940 --> 00:52:40.210
Charles Ying - NSF: uh, I will add, uh, if you use a uh a fabrication facility or other two uh off of beyond those four companies um intel, micro and and some you may reach to those companies.

271
00:52:42.660 --> 00:52:43.899
Jason Hallstrom: It's you.

272
00:52:44.420 --> 00:53:02.259
Jason Hallstrom: So this is a a question really for Micron and Samsung. I I believe I know the the answer, but of course invite our our colleagues to to correct me. If i'm wrong, the question is, Does Micron and Samsung provide access to their memory? Fabrication facilities confused to award needs? The short answer is,

273
00:53:02.270 --> 00:53:14.080
Jason Hallstrom: should not assume that they have access to any facilities of the participating industry. Two partners that would be discussed post award, but of course, invite our colleagues from Micron and Samson to

274
00:53:15.630 --> 00:53:18.850
Mark Helm: That's indeed my expectation as well, Jason,

275
00:53:19.780 --> 00:53:20.859
Jason Hallstrom: he's Mark,

276
00:53:24.010 --> 00:53:31.589
Jason Hallstrom: Charles. This next question is, for you can a senior personnel from a fuse. One project participate in a fuse to project the

277
00:53:32.600 --> 00:53:37.389
Charles Ying - NSF: Yes with the understanding that senior person now

278
00:53:37.550 --> 00:53:40.399
Charles Ying - NSF: he is now the piano copia.

279
00:53:43.960 --> 00:53:45.149
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you.

280
00:53:47.730 --> 00:53:50.290
Charles Ying - NSF: Okay, let me be a more clear

281
00:53:50.300 --> 00:53:58.719
Charles Ying - NSF: If a senior personnel in the fields, one proposal and a pills one a word

282
00:53:58.860 --> 00:54:16.389
Charles Ying - NSF: was not at the Pr. Ah compr level, and then such an individual can participate. The force field. Two proposal in any capacity could be a P. I or could be a non-copi senior person. Now,

283
00:54:16.400 --> 00:54:19.270
Charles Ying - NSF: if a current,

284
00:54:19.290 --> 00:54:28.630
Charles Ying - NSF: P. Iii. Award made in September of two thousand and twenty three

285
00:54:28.830 --> 00:54:46.830
Charles Ying - NSF: um. Such person cannot be a Pi Alcopi of a proposal to be some better in watch. That person could be a Nano P. I see the personnel play at a smaller row

286
00:54:46.840 --> 00:55:05.179
Charles Ying - NSF: in addition, and as I've made Ah! Several teaming awards. Ah! Early last year, with proposals embedded in the December of twenty, twenty, two. There's no restriction for any of the P. Iii. Or senior personnel

287
00:55:05.190 --> 00:55:07.609
Charles Ying - NSF: for those awards.

288
00:55:11.370 --> 00:55:15.059
Jason Hallstrom: So the next question i'll ask Eleanor to address.

289
00:55:15.310 --> 00:55:26.010
Jason Hallstrom: There seems to be restrictions on the involvement of industry partners in the proposal. Is it okay to mention that students will apply for internships at the industry partners as part of their workforce?

290
00:55:30.790 --> 00:55:39.929
Eleanor Sayre: Well, i'm happy to answer part of this, which is It's absolutely okay for your students to seek internships as part of their training.

291
00:55:43.050 --> 00:55:44.430
Eleanor Sayre: It's

292
00:55:44.520 --> 00:55:53.829
Eleanor Sayre: and we're pretty clear that you can't be having our industry partners as part of your proposal.

293
00:55:55.570 --> 00:55:56.980
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you a lot,

294
00:55:56.990 --> 00:55:59.500
Jason Hallstrom: Nadia. The next question will be for you.

295
00:55:59.520 --> 00:56:05.350
Jason Hallstrom: It correct. That goalies are allowed and require an industry co-pi, to,

296
00:56:05.590 --> 00:56:09.099
Jason Hallstrom: but they just cannot be from the four partner organizations

297
00:56:10.010 --> 00:56:11.290
Nadia El-Masry: that's correct.

298
00:56:13.270 --> 00:56:19.350
Nadia El-Masry: A follow-up question nadia What level of commercialization potential should the proposed

299
00:56:19.660 --> 00:56:21.959
Jason Hallstrom: technologies have at this stage.

300
00:56:25.090 --> 00:56:45.789
Nadia El-Masry: Uh, if you're referring to the Gr eleven, I guess. Yeah, it it is uh this fuse uh So station is supposed to cross uh from the basic science to the industry. Uh transparency translation. In other words, I would say,

301
00:56:47.360 --> 00:57:03.260
Nadia El-Masry: it depends T. R. L. It depends on what are you doing in your In other words, i'm sure the industry partners would welcome any high level of Ah pick, transfer.

302
00:57:05.420 --> 00:57:08.929
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you, Nadia prem. The next question is for you.

303
00:57:08.960 --> 00:57:15.630
Jason Hallstrom: So it's used to consider test reliability and failure analysis for advanced packaging.

304
00:57:16.120 --> 00:57:18.490
Premjeet Chahal: The short answer is, Yes,

305
00:57:18.500 --> 00:57:45.250
Premjeet Chahal: Ah, make sure it cuts across the deck stack. The two text texts for sure. And also you're going to be careful as to which of the topics area you want to pick. For example, say, if you go to do reliability? Is it from materials point of view, or is it a different level? And which of the topics would you forward? The short answer is, Yes, it's allowed. But make sure you pick the two stack areas as well as the topic.

306
00:57:47.560 --> 00:57:48.640
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you

307
00:57:51.250 --> 00:57:52.319
Jason Hallstrom: right,

308
00:57:53.050 --> 00:57:56.390
Jason Hallstrom: Nadia. I'm going to. I'm going to send one more your way.

309
00:57:56.400 --> 00:58:01.409
Nadia El-Masry: Okay. Do the funds allowed for fabrication and packaging? Sorry,

310
00:58:01.580 --> 00:58:03.490
Jason Hallstrom: I think the question is,

311
00:58:03.800 --> 00:58:08.580
Jason Hallstrom: Is it permissible to include funds for fabrication,

312
00:58:08.700 --> 00:58:11.149
Jason Hallstrom: packaging at industry partners.

313
00:58:11.410 --> 00:58:17.459
Jason Hallstrom: Is there a preference for the collaborating companies that should be chosen for fabrication and packaging?

314
00:58:17.670 --> 00:58:24.109
Jason Hallstrom: Then can we pick other? That is non fuse to industry partners such as Tsmc:

315
00:58:25.450 --> 00:58:28.739
Nadia El-Masry: Okay, I would advise that. Do not

316
00:58:29.550 --> 00:58:35.959
Nadia El-Masry: ten point to any of the four industry partner that you're going to use there for application. Facility.

317
00:58:36.090 --> 00:58:38.109
Nadia El-Masry: Allow in your budget

318
00:58:38.500 --> 00:58:40.410
Nadia El-Masry: the fabrication,

319
00:58:40.420 --> 00:58:54.160
Nadia El-Masry: as you know, an unknown entity where you're going. However, if you're already have a fabrication facility that you are using. That's not one of the four industry partners you can identify.

320
00:58:55.680 --> 00:58:56.970
Jason Hallstrom: Take barrier,

321
00:58:57.140 --> 00:59:16.009
Jason Hallstrom: Charles I'm. Going to ask a question. You've touched upon this already. But there are still some questions coming in, so I want to give you another chance to hit on this, and the question is, if twofold um, if we collaborate with a national lab, how might they be funded? And then the second question connected is,

322
00:59:16.020 --> 00:59:18.659
Jason Hallstrom: if you have a pi at an Sfr. Dt.

323
00:59:18.940 --> 00:59:23.460
Jason Hallstrom: Who is also an adjunct at a local university. Can they propose?

324
00:59:24.850 --> 00:59:26.470
Charles Ying - NSF: Ah,

325
00:59:26.970 --> 00:59:31.429
Charles Ying - NSF: do not propose a sub award to the National national lab.

326
00:59:32.970 --> 00:59:35.599
Charles Ying - NSF: Okay, I think that's make you very clear.

327
00:59:36.030 --> 00:59:37.370
Charles Ying - NSF: Um!

328
00:59:39.730 --> 00:59:45.049
Charles Ying - NSF: If somebody was a primary appointment at the at the National

329
00:59:45.210 --> 00:59:52.569
Charles Ying - NSF: at the end, it is, uh with the Akron name. What is it. F.

330
00:59:53.200 --> 00:59:54.739
Jason Hallstrom: The epochs are Dc.

331
00:59:54.760 --> 01:00:02.410
Charles Ying - NSF: Fr Dc. Right? So that person cannot be a pi I cop here of the proposal.

332
01:00:04.110 --> 01:00:19.490
Charles Ying - NSF: Um! It's possible that the Uh. A graduate student, a postdoc or senior faculty could spend a small fresh on a time at the National Lab.

333
01:00:24.080 --> 01:00:25.359
Jason Hallstrom: They drunk,

334
01:00:25.710 --> 01:00:28.490
Nadia El-Masry: I I believe, uh uh, uh,

335
01:00:28.500 --> 01:00:30.549
Nadia El-Masry: Jason.

336
01:00:35.610 --> 01:00:44.310
Nadia El-Masry: That's you know. If this is, you know the concept. Just ask yourself. I'm collaborating with this lab. Is it federally fun?

337
01:00:44.470 --> 01:00:46.740
Nadia El-Masry: It's, you know it is. No,

338
01:00:48.810 --> 01:00:57.940
Jason Hallstrom: thank you, Nadia Michael. The next question is for you, and I sent you a message, a private message in chat as well. So the question is, Is there a single?

339
01:00:58.200 --> 01:01:02.959
Jason Hallstrom: It just jumped on me. Sorry. Is there a single place or a set of places

340
01:01:03.190 --> 01:01:10.199
Jason Hallstrom: to look at the services that are offered by the participating companies. Many may not be aware of what is available.

341
01:01:11.940 --> 01:01:13.180
Michael Huff: Um,

342
01:01:13.430 --> 01:01:27.219
Michael Huff: I you're not supposed to reach out to the companies. I know. That is a fact with regard to the companies making any kind of fabrication or services available.

343
01:01:27.440 --> 01:01:30.810
Michael Huff: It's not incorporated into the proposal,

344
01:01:30.830 --> 01:01:44.189
Michael Huff: so you essentially you find out what they have to offer. If you're awarded, and then you have the ability to have contact with those industrial partners.

345
01:01:47.760 --> 01:01:50.970
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you, the child. The next question is for you

346
01:01:52.050 --> 01:01:58.640
Jason Hallstrom: can a fuse to P. I. I also serve as a reviewer for other fuse to proposals. The

347
01:02:00.560 --> 01:02:03.590
Charles Ying - NSF: Ah! We do not plan to do so

348
01:02:05.890 --> 01:02:19.260
Nadia El-Masry: Now we are in the process of creating the legal document for a conflict of interest. So, and we are not planning to involve those pis of copies impacts.

349
01:02:20.040 --> 01:02:23.120
Nadia El-Masry: That's the consensus of the working group.

350
01:02:24.430 --> 01:02:38.590
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you. Naya. The next question is, Proposals can cover two topic areas. Should both of them be included in the proposal title? The answer is, No, Only the primary topic area must be included within the title.

351
01:02:45.530 --> 01:02:50.069
Jason Hallstrom: The next question I will ask Mark to address.

352
01:02:50.570 --> 01:02:56.840
Jason Hallstrom: Would it be fine and beneficial to have support letters from non-fuse to partners,

353
01:03:05.390 --> 01:03:16.139
Jason Hallstrom: and I i'm sorry mark. So the question is for Michael Tory. Would it be fine and beneficial to have support letters from companies that are not in the fuse too much.

354
01:03:16.750 --> 01:03:18.490
Michael Huff: They're absolutely

355
01:03:20.050 --> 01:03:21.109
Jason Hallstrom: he's

356
01:03:27.640 --> 01:03:45.040
Nadia El-Masry: um um Jason. I think there is the issue of collaborative proposals, that there were several questions about them, and the decision was to have only one proposal from the lead Institution and

357
01:03:45.050 --> 01:03:49.060
Nadia El-Masry: other institutions will be sub our these

358
01:03:49.240 --> 01:03:50.920
Nadia El-Masry: and yes,

359
01:03:51.150 --> 01:03:56.589
Nadia El-Masry: anyone from the Saba or these can be on the cover page as a copia.

360
01:03:58.700 --> 01:03:59.849
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you.

361
01:04:06.830 --> 01:04:26.179
Jason Hallstrom: So the next question is, It seems that the transformative aspect of the and Nsf. Intellectual merit and broader impact criteria have been relaxed for this solicitation. Can you confirm or comment on the standard review criteria apply for both intellectual merit and broader impacts. They have not been weakened or loosened in any way.

362
01:04:27.410 --> 01:04:37.480
Jason Hallstrom: The next question is, is it considered an advantage for a proposal to cover multiple topics as opposed to at least two stack layer.

363
01:04:37.710 --> 01:04:47.849
Jason Hallstrom: So I invite any of the Pds on the call. To add to this, but the short answer is that we always punch to the pis on how best

364
01:04:47.910 --> 01:04:57.019
Jason Hallstrom: their proposal, if it makes sense for your particular proposal to span more than two topics. Absolutely. That's appropriate and permissible.

365
01:04:57.170 --> 01:05:00.789
There is no specific advantage to covering three layers of the stuff you

366
01:05:01.240 --> 01:05:02.470
Jason Hallstrom: it's

367
01:05:09.970 --> 01:05:24.110
Eleanor Sayre: in general we love it when you are clear in what you want to do, and then pieces of your proposal are concurrent with each other, and the more pieces you add the more opportunity there are to lose coherence.

368
01:05:24.130 --> 01:05:30.009
Eleanor Sayre: So um put together a clear and coherent uh proposal.

369
01:05:30.380 --> 01:05:37.090
Eleanor Sayre: But don't try to stuff in everything plus the kitchen sink, because that is an opportunity to lose coherent

370
01:05:38.100 --> 01:05:51.780
Jason Hallstrom: Eleanor. Your your answer was so terrific i'm going to send a follow up on a on a related thread. So the question is, Can you provide guidance on how we should select a topic area given that the proposal might span more than one topic area.

371
01:05:52.020 --> 01:05:54.649
Jason Hallstrom: If one area is not dominant, the

372
01:06:03.650 --> 01:06:11.010
Eleanor Sayre: write a one-pager that says what you want to do and send it to us at fuse one and Nsf.

373
01:06:12.780 --> 01:06:17.590
Eleanor Sayre: And you can get some more specific feedback for the specific thing you were trying to do.

374
01:06:19.240 --> 01:06:22.140
Jason Hallstrom: Great, Thank you, Eleanor. The next question is for Nadia.

375
01:06:22.530 --> 01:06:26.650
Jason Hallstrom: Will this sub awardee from other universities be considered as a cocaine

376
01:06:26.690 --> 01:06:32.960
Jason Hallstrom: question? Is, can they be considered a copy? I, And is there a limit to how many sub awardees that may be involved. The

377
01:06:34.020 --> 01:06:53.260
Nadia El-Masry: well, it depends on your budget how many Sub. I would. This you would like to add to your proposal. And so uh, yeah, I mean, you know the the the cover page openness that allows, I think, for a copy eyes. And so it it is really up to you how you you want to craft your proposal.

378
01:06:54.980 --> 01:06:57.959
Jason Hallstrom: And, Sam, The next question is for you

379
01:06:58.360 --> 01:07:04.639
Jason Hallstrom: how detailed should the workforce development plan be? And can we allocate budget for it?

380
01:07:05.500 --> 01:07:34.389
ChunSheng "Sam" Xin: Yeah. I was just trying to type the audience first of all. Ah, the budget that can be eliminated. Ah, for the for the development and the education plan, and regarding the details I think about on. Ah, all the ah! This will be a ah live to the pi, so I will say, Ah, first of all, you will need to provide a innovative plan for workforce development and education. And really, regarding what kind of level details.

381
01:07:34.400 --> 01:07:38.170
ChunSheng "Sam" Xin: I think this will lead back to the Api's.

382
01:07:39.080 --> 01:07:42.630
Eleanor Sayre: I I will add to to what Tim just said.

383
01:07:43.210 --> 01:07:49.829
Eleanor Sayre: If you feel tempted to integrate your workforce development plans into different aspects of your proposal.

384
01:07:49.840 --> 01:08:05.589
Eleanor Sayre: As you write your project description, you are encouraged to um collect them all together into one section, so that we can clearly identify your education and workforce development plan which could reference other sections as appropriate.

385
01:08:05.600 --> 01:08:07.870
Eleanor Sayre: Yeah, Budget Rachel's,

386
01:08:08.790 --> 01:08:10.680
Jason Hallstrom: take them, take down all.

387
01:08:10.950 --> 01:08:19.359
Jason Hallstrom: So there are no additional open questions, so I think perhaps what we'll do is wait a minute to see if there are any other questions that may pop up

388
01:08:19.430 --> 01:08:24.800
Jason Hallstrom: before we close the Webinar, it will give everyone a chance to offer any additional questions you may have.

389
01:08:28.240 --> 01:08:39.389
Charles Ying - NSF: We have. We have also the many questions are in writing. If you think your question has not been fully answered, you may

390
01:08:39.560 --> 01:08:40.840
Charles Ying - NSF: us again,

391
01:08:45.350 --> 01:08:47.909
Jason Hallstrom: Sharon, we have a question for you

392
01:08:48.100 --> 01:08:51.600
Jason Hallstrom: for topic, one domain-specific computing

393
01:08:51.649 --> 01:09:00.609
Jason Hallstrom: how specific should it be? Are we focusing on specific applications, for example, Ecg. Detection or general application, for example, health care,

394
01:09:01.920 --> 01:09:26.870
X. Sharon Hu: I think, at the end of the day. This is the fuse proposal, so it has to be focusing on this one of the the two of the three stacks that Jason has mentioned. The end application could be one application. It could be a broad application domain. Either one is fine, but for one application I think you need to justify that application is really an important and critical application.

395
01:09:28.310 --> 01:09:33.090
X. Sharon Hu: So think about the impact, the transformative impact that the proposal will have.

396
01:09:34.609 --> 01:09:35.849
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you,

397
01:09:36.689 --> 01:09:38.949
Jason Hallstrom: Nadia. Next question is for you

398
01:09:39.979 --> 01:09:47.109
Jason Hallstrom: two million dollars for three years. Seems like a lot. Is there a penalty for smaller proposals with smaller teams?

399
01:09:48.550 --> 01:09:52.690
Nadia El-Masry: Of course there are no penalties for having

400
01:09:52.700 --> 01:10:01.709
Nadia El-Masry: logical proposal that have a co-designed approach and identify topic areas and technical stacks that make sense.

401
01:10:01.720 --> 01:10:09.860
Nadia El-Masry: Of course, you know the level of funding. It depends on the the efforts that are proposed.

402
01:10:12.170 --> 01:10:14.369
Jason Hallstrom: Thanks, Nadia. Next question

403
01:10:15.150 --> 01:10:19.010
Jason Hallstrom: is the workforce Development Plan and Project Management plan.

404
01:10:19.550 --> 01:10:22.010
Documents are part of the fifteen. They're part of the fifteen,

405
01:10:28.200 --> 01:10:29.879
Charles Ying - NSF: as he now says. No,

406
01:10:30.540 --> 01:10:45.020
Nadia El-Masry: it is part of the fifteen pages. That's right. It is part of the fifteen pages. The The answer to that one is, is the yes. Oh, no, I can't remember how it was raised. It is included in the fifteen. It is. Those are not separate documents

407
01:10:45.380 --> 01:10:49.289
Eleanor Sayre: for the network sections. Yes. Separate documents. No?

408
01:10:49.540 --> 01:10:50.860
Jason Hallstrom: Yeah. Thanks, Eleanor.

409
01:10:50.900 --> 01:10:54.120
Charles Ying - NSF: Uh, can I? Uh add a clarification.

410
01:10:55.010 --> 01:11:12.850
Charles Ying - NSF: Ah! So the earlier we discussed about the Fsr. Dc. And then our such as Ah laboratory operate for the diploma. And if there is a scientist at the Ffrbc

411
01:11:12.860 --> 01:11:32.660
Charles Ying - NSF: ah! Such as you know a deal lab and with primary appointment at the A university with secondary appointment at at such an organization. And that's scientists with primary appointment at University in the Us. University can be A. P. Iii. And our senior personnel

412
01:11:33.380 --> 01:11:38.149
Charles Ying - NSF: again. Uh, no sub award to Ffr. Dc:

413
01:11:40.710 --> 01:11:41.849
Jason Hallstrom: Thanks, Charlotte.

414
01:11:42.290 --> 01:11:48.200
Jason Hallstrom: So, Eleanor, I see you answering the current question. Would you like to answer that in real time?

415
01:11:49.240 --> 01:12:02.640
Eleanor Sayre: Sure. So the question here is, um is review location determined by which we choose as a primary track um size, Mps, or engineering and determined is a strong word.

416
01:12:02.650 --> 01:12:18.820
Eleanor Sayre: Your primary choice is highly suggestive of where it will go, but it could be that we um as we read your proposal, and as we read, or everybody's proposals, then we do some shuffling around to make sure that each panel is intellectually

417
01:12:20.900 --> 01:12:41.490
Nadia El-Masry: uh, Let me add, Eleanor, that uh, you know, after Api, the size which topic area he wants to apply to, that comes to us. And so among ourselves, we will decide that. Yes, the proposal falls into this category or no, it is stronger in a different public area,

418
01:12:41.500 --> 01:12:44.930
Nadia El-Masry: and then we start shuffling as alien or said,

419
01:12:45.580 --> 01:12:51.529
Eleanor Sayre: Yeah, make good choices to help us do good sorting, but also we do the sorting, not you.

420
01:12:52.140 --> 01:13:14.170
X. Sharon Hu: I think there may be also a little confusion there. What do we mean by track, and what do we mean by topic? So you are. You have to cover two plus tracks, but the topic area. You have to have only have one primary outfit area, and we typically, in general typically based on the topic area to assign

421
01:13:14.180 --> 01:13:26.710
X. Sharon Hu: which directly they those do, but it's not always right. But that's that's basically give us a guideline. However, you do have to cover two tracks, so make sure you know the difference between topics and tracks. Don't. Confuse the two.

422
01:13:30.300 --> 01:13:31.349
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you.

423
01:13:32.720 --> 01:13:39.940
Jason Hallstrom: So again we'll follow the same protocol. We'll wait a minute or two to see if there are any lingering questions folks may have.

424
01:13:54.340 --> 01:13:59.850
Jason Hallstrom: So there is. There is a question i'm not sure that I

425
01:13:59.890 --> 01:14:02.430
Jason Hallstrom: I see the contradiction. So the question is

426
01:14:02.600 --> 01:14:10.059
Jason Hallstrom: earlier. It was stated That topic one is size topic, two is engineering and topics three is Mp.

427
01:14:10.450 --> 01:14:11.730
Jason Hallstrom: Right? And P. Answering.

428
01:14:11.990 --> 01:14:14.310
Jason Hallstrom: The last answer contradicted this:

429
01:14:14.320 --> 01:14:16.210
Jason Hallstrom: Charles, can you clarify

430
01:14:17.570 --> 01:14:18.910
Charles Ying - NSF: It's

431
01:14:19.860 --> 01:14:23.200
Charles Ying - NSF: topic one. Okay. So if it's submitted

432
01:14:23.290 --> 01:14:32.809
Charles Ying - NSF: the top one, most likely the proposal will be revealed in the panels organized by size.

433
01:14:32.830 --> 01:14:36.630
Charles Ying - NSF: Uh, if you'll submit a proposal

434
01:14:36.640 --> 01:14:56.100
Charles Ying - NSF: indicating topic two, and then most likely the proposal will be reviewing the panel organized by the gearing. But with, and that if you submit a proposal in top three. Most likely the proposal will be revealed in the panel organized by the Mps.

435
01:14:56.110 --> 01:15:13.720
Charles Ying - NSF: But Nsf. Reserved the right to make adjustment if it would look at a proposal. If you submitted a proposal to top one, and then we say, maybe it's best revealed in the engineering ah panel, we will reserve right to do so,

436
01:15:13.730 --> 01:15:34.829
Charles Ying - NSF: and the second, even those proposal is revealed in a particular in the panel organized by, for example, size. Ah, it's likely there will be some engineering approval and dog to be there, or if you're submitted. But you know, if it were both ah revealed in engineering, it could be sized. Pd. To be there on the

437
01:15:34.840 --> 01:15:36.559
Charles Ying - NSF: but the Director P. There.

438
01:15:36.610 --> 01:15:49.280
Charles Ying - NSF: Okay. So each proposal need to cover at least two technologies that if you you know. For example, if it's submitted to top three, if you

439
01:15:49.890 --> 01:16:09.039
Charles Ying - NSF: can, you present on ninety five percent of the materials or chemistry, and such proportion will be revealed, but may not be what will not be competitive. You need to have a device component, a substantial device component if even you select the topic three.

440
01:16:14.510 --> 01:16:25.049
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you, Charles. So the next question is, How do we allocate copies? If we're only allowed for? And the short answer is that we always defer to the proposing team to make those

441
01:16:25.560 --> 01:16:26.679
Jason Hallstrom: it is

442
01:16:26.820 --> 01:16:35.860
Jason Hallstrom: we defer to you. But it is typical for those with the most significant intellectual leadership in the program to serve as as copies.

443
01:16:39.620 --> 01:16:41.999
Jason Hallstrom: So the next question

444
01:16:42.310 --> 01:16:44.769
Jason Hallstrom: I'm. Going to ask Nadia to address

445
01:16:45.040 --> 01:17:04.479
Jason Hallstrom: it was just stated that we should clearly distinguish the track that is stack levels from topics, that is, that we should address the late. We should make it clear which layer and which topics we're addressing. The problem is that the slide from last year Also point out that there is an option to have one topic plus two layer. Correct

446
01:17:04.670 --> 01:17:07.419
Jason Hallstrom: two topics, plus two layers. Also correct.

447
01:17:07.490 --> 01:17:08.810
Jason Hallstrom: Can you clarify

448
01:17:16.030 --> 01:17:35.370
Nadia El-Masry: topic area when you're writing a proposal? You know exactly where you want your proposal? Go to? And as far as having more than one topic area. Most probably there is a strength of the proposal that you are writing. Where is the topic? So

449
01:17:35.960 --> 01:17:38.189
Nadia El-Masry: the clue here is the topic air.

450
01:17:38.200 --> 01:17:46.939
Nadia El-Masry: So let you know if i'm writing that proposal. I would like to address, for example, a proposal that

451
01:17:47.010 --> 01:17:51.010
Nadia El-Masry: strongly materials, engineering,

452
01:17:51.110 --> 01:18:05.759
Nadia El-Masry: and so I would address that like novel materials, preparing new novel materials and allowing it to go all the way to device structure. So now we are doing two stacks, material and device.

453
01:18:05.770 --> 01:18:15.209
Nadia El-Masry: But we are addressing a novelty of the new material. Therefore you, I am addressing the topic free

454
01:18:15.610 --> 01:18:19.010
Nadia El-Masry: group type of proposals, which is materials.

455
01:18:19.130 --> 01:18:20.949
Nadia El-Masry: It is a

456
01:18:21.030 --> 01:18:30.649
Nadia El-Masry: devices and systems, and i'm going to refer to Pram to correct me if i'm incorrect, we're talking about topic two,

457
01:18:31.450 --> 01:18:44.469
Nadia El-Masry: all right. And so you just think from it. As far I I can understand that that would be more than one copy. I have the strength in different topic areas.

458
01:18:44.720 --> 01:18:53.510
Nadia El-Masry: So that's why you should identify which topic area you would like to address, even though if there are both of them are strong.

459
01:18:55.130 --> 01:18:58.020
Nadia El-Masry: You're going to leave that decision to us

460
01:18:58.910 --> 01:19:01.210
Nadia El-Masry: where that proposal will go

461
01:19:02.000 --> 01:19:04.290
Nadia El-Masry: and pray me if you would like that.

462
01:19:04.830 --> 01:19:06.590
Premjeet Chahal: Now that is correct, Nadia.

463
01:19:06.600 --> 01:19:25.160
Premjeet Chahal: So I mean just for everybody understanding. The goal is that we want your proposal to be reviewed fairly, and we have the right experts in the panel for that, and that is the goal. So if you know where where you feel. It should feel that helps us to get there then eventually, and the panel is going to be in traditional. So

464
01:19:25.170 --> 01:19:29.749
Premjeet Chahal: you know it's reviewed fairly, and they are experts in that panel. That's the key goal.

465
01:19:31.870 --> 01:19:33.730
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you, Brian. Thank you, Nadia.

466
01:19:51.080 --> 01:20:08.959
Jason Hallstrom: So I can see that we're beginning to have attendees log off, and so I think that folks have exhausted the set of questions that they may have had. Of course, if there are questions that arise after the close of the Webinar, you should feel free to reach out. We're here to help. Please contact us and fuse one at Nsf. Gov.

467
01:20:09.000 --> 01:20:19.910
Jason Hallstrom: With that we're going to conclude the Webinar today. We're grateful for the time that you've invested into the fuse to program. Thank you for your interest. Thank you for attending the Webinar, and we wish you the best of luck in successful applications.

468
01:20:19.970 --> 01:20:21.320
Jason Hallstrom: Thank you for attending.

